Learn about mandatory binding arbitration, its process, pros and cons, costs, and how it compares to court trials. Find out why some prefer trials for better outcomes.

Next chapter IDR trends show 80% provider success in arbitration and offer strategies to address revenue challenges under the No Surprises Act.

A federal judge struck down key parts of a regulation outlining a ban on surprise medical bills, siding with doctors that the rule tilts too favorably to insurers. The ruling delivered late Monday in ...

A judge in Texas again ruled against the federal government over its implementation of the ban on surprise medical bills and said the third party process to resolve payment disputes is unlawful and ...

With all of the player movement and flying paychecks, the offseason can sometimes be as exciting as the regular season. As we enter the final phase of the offseason of 2004-2005, salary arbitration ...

Since its bipartisan enactment in late December 2020, the No Surprises Act (NSA) has been championed as a significant victory for health care reform aimed at protecting consumers from the most ...

Employers want quick arbitration but must ensure legal enforceability. The Flores case shows that vague or unfair arbitration ...

When Nancy Penoyer-Blau filed an arbitration claim against her brokerage firm 19 months ago, she expected a simple process with a quick resolution. What the Woodland Hills, Calif., woman got instead ...

The Brian Flores lawsuit is currently "on ice" as the judge in the southern district of New York decides whether to agree with Flores' attorneys and have the case in open court or side with the NFL ...